Kanye West's Wife's Outfit Labeled 'Disgusting' By Potential Juror In Rapper's Malibu Mansion Trial

Potential jurors in Kanye West’s Malibu mansion trial are aware of his wife Bianca Censori's style and have expressed their disapproval.

Potential jurors in Kanye West's ongoing Malibu mansion trial are well aware of his wife's fashion style and have expressed their disapproval.

West is married to Bianca Censori, who has become known in recent years for her bold and often provocative style, even during public appearances.

Jurors also reportedly took issue with West's social media behavior, and both he and Censori expected to testify as the case moves forward.

A Juror Called Bianca Censori's Grammy Outfit 'Disgusting'

During a jury selection hearing for Kanye West's $57 million Malibu mansion lawsuit against a construction worker, things got a bit personal when they were asked whether "they had formed opinions" about the rapper and his wife, Bianca Censori.

According to the New York Post, the majority of the proposed pool raised their hands to affirm they had, and for Censori, those opinions appeared to center on her fashion choices.

On a number of occasions, Censori has appeared in public wearing a variety of risqué outfits, with some going as far as putting her privates on display.

At last year's Grammys red carpet, she pushed boundaries even further by dressing nearly naked in a skintight, fully see-through dress, which she had initially covered with a long black fuzzy coat.

The attire was referenced specifically by juror #37, who described it as "disgusting."

"I saw it on Facebook," said the individual. "I don't know if his wife? I didn't like the way she presented himself. I don't want to look at it. It's disgusting!" she stated, before adding she could still remain unbiased during the trial.

The Rapper Was Criticized For His Social Media Antics

As for West, some jurors pointed out that they had issues with his social media antics, which had already garnered him negative traction over the years.

One retired school teacher, who is #45 in the pool, even revealed that his low opinion of West is shared by his relatives.

"I don't like what he supports. My relatives are very against this guy," the juror said.

Another juror, who is an IT specialist, pointed out that they had read about his rants on Reddit, which "shifted negatively" their opinion of the rapper.

One more juror, a female, referenced West's rants against Jewish people, saying that not only did she dislike what he said about them, but the rapper also has a poor understanding of how to approach such issues.

"He simplifies things. This guy doesn't analyze things properly," the individual noted.

All About Kanye West's $57 Million Malibu Mansion Case\

For the case, West is being sued by Tony Saxon, a construction worker who worked on the remodeling of the rapper's $57 million Malibu Mansion years ago.

Originally designed by star architect Tadao Ando for financier Richard Sachs, the 4,000-square-foot home was purchased by Kanye West in 2021 for $57.25 million during his divorce from Kim Kardashian. The rapper has since offloaded it to Bellwood Investment for under half of what he paid.

Now, according to court documents, Saxon claims that West withheld his wages and subjected him to unsafe working conditions during the renovation. He also alleges that he was wrongfully terminated by the rapper.

Saxon is seeking more than a million dollars in damages from the court and is expected to testify at the trial, alongside West and Censori.

The Rapper's Attorney Refuted Tony Saxon's Claims About Payment During Opening Statement

On Tuesday, opening statements for the Malibu mansion case were delivered by the lawyers representing both sides.

West's attorney, Andrew Cherkasky, came out strong to quickly deny Saxon's allegations about payment, per Rolling Stone.

He claimed that Saxon was well paid for the six weeks of work on the "architectural gem" and  that while he was hired for "renovation prep work," he instead "destroyed the Ando house."

Kanye West's Attorney Accused The Alleged Victim Of Setting 'An Impossible Standard' For Himself

West's attorney also dismissed Saxon's claim that he was forced to live in the building during the renovation, insisting that the decision was entirely his own.

"It was Saxon who set for himself an impossible standard. He wanted to work 24/7. He wanted to camp at the house. He wanted to be the guy in charge," Cherkasky told the jurors.

The attorney continued, "Ye will tell you he was shocked hearing there was no bathroom there. … Nobody asked [Saxon] to stay there, certainly not overnight."